Our latest Freakonomics broadcast episode is known as sex that is“Making Pay — and Pay and Pay and Pay.” (it is possible to sign up for the podcast at iTunes or somewhere else, obtain the rss, or pay attention through the news player above. You could see the transcript, including credits for the songs hear that is you’ll the episode.)
The gist of the episode: Yes, intercourse crimes are horrific, together with perpetrators deserve to harshly be punished. But culture keeps exacting costs — out-of-pocket and otherwise — long after the jail phrase was offered.
This episode ended up being motivated (as numerous of our most useful episodes are) by an email from the podcast listener. Their title is Jake Swartz:
And so I just completed my M.A. in forensic therapy at John Jay and began an internship in a brand new city … I spend the majority of my times spending time with lovely people like rapists and pedophiles. Within my internship, we mainly do therapy (both group and person) with convicted intercourse offenders and it also made me recognize being fully an intercourse offender is really a terrible concept (in addition to the apparent reasons). It is economically disastrous! I believe it will be interesting to pay for the economics of being a intercourse offender.
We assumed that by “economically disastrous,” Jake had been mostly speaking about sex-offender registries, which constrain a intercourse offender’s choices after getting away from prison (including where he or she can live, work, etc.). Nevertheless when we accompanied up with Jake, we discovered he had been talking about an entire other group of expenses paid by convicted intercourse offenders. Comente